South China Morning Post
Wednesday February 27, 2002
A land misunderstood
Jasper Becker in Beijing examines two studies that offer contrasting economic forecasts for the mainland now it is a
member of the World Trade Organisation
AMERICAN SCHOLAR Nicholas Lardy takes a reassuring and often contrarian view of the impact of China's
entry into the World Trade Organisation in a new study produced for the Brookings Institution in Washington.
'China already is more integrated into the world economy than is commonly understood,' he writes in Integrating
China into the Global Economy, one of the most detailed investigations so far available.
Lardy, whose 1998 work China's Unfinished Economic Revolution raised a red flag over the mainland's dangerously
unreformed banking system, argues that doomsayers are wrong. They have misunderstood the present and the
future perils.
'The large role of transnational companies in generating exports reflects China's deep rather than shallow
integration into the world economy,' he writes. WTO does not spell either domestic or international problems, or at
least not bigger social or economic crises than already have emerged along the road to reform.
Earlier projections of the cost of WTO membership said eight million wheat farmers would lose their jobs along
with many other workers in sectors such as rapeseed oil, natural rubber, plastics and rolled steel. 'These almost
certainly overstate the challenges because the projections, based on conditions in the mid-1990s, fail to take account
of the huge economic restructuring before WTO entry,' he writes.
Lardy believes those who fear China will be swamped by imports have ignored the aggressive restructuring of many
industries, such as textiles, that already has taken place. And they should see that a large convergence of Chinese
domestic prices and those on international markets already has taken place.
Largely in response to relative price changes, Chinese farmers already have been moving out of land-intensive
horticultural crops into areas where they enjoy a comparative advantage. He quotes figures showing that the
absolute numbers involved in agriculture peaked in 1991 at 390 million and have since dropped by an annual
average of four million.
Lardy argues that the foreseeable impact of the structural transformation of the labour force, especially in
agriculture, will not be greater than in the past decade or more. The Government has used WTO membership to
accelerate the pace of agricultural reform. Lardy believes it has recognised that China has no comparative
advantage in land-intensive grain production and that it does not intend to protect the farmers with ever-growing
subsidies. By doing so, Beijing has rejected Japan's protectionist approach and will not wall off its grain sector in
the future.
On the contrary, 'China's commitments to eliminate agricultural export subsidies on entry seem without parallel'.
The mainland has made 'an important commitment to allow market mechanisms in domestic agriculture' and to let
market incentives push farmers into other solutions. He foresees China becoming a major exporter of walnuts,
apples, citrus fruits, strawberries, grapes, asparagus, processed tomatoes and many other crops.
Even in other sectors which have been heavily protected, Lardy thinks the dismantling of tariffs will not be all that
threatening. Average tariffs are already low but remain high on key items such as principal commodities including
cars and car parts.
Their existence, or any other non-tariff barriers that might be erected, will not be that important. For example, he
says China has opted against the idea of nurturing a purely indigenous automotive industry, the way Japan or South
Korea did. That means an industry is emerging which is dominated by joint ventures, so many in fact that excess
capacity will be more important as a source of downward pressure on prices than tariff reductions on imports.
In the key banking sector, Lardy predicts that foreign competition will not take a large share of domestic currency
deposits for a long time. 'The challenges to Chinese banks are less daunting than sometimes portrayed,' he says. The
real problems with the banking system will remain elsewhere. The benefits of China's accession to the WTO,
particularly from increased competition, could be lost, he warns, if the banks do not stop lending to inefficient state
companies that are responsible for overproduction.
Assuming the best, Lardy even thinks that membership could bring about 'potential impressive gains in economic
efficiency'. 'Indeed the gains are likely to be greater than those predicted in most published quantitative estimates,
since those studies do not capture fully the likely effect of more foreign competition on domestic firms,' he writes.
The prospects for generating employment are 'bountiful', he estimates. China could benefit from the phase-out of
arrangements restricting world trade in textiles and apparel by Taiwan, Mexico and the European Union.
Lardy also argues convincingly that those who doubt China's commitment to the WTO philosophy of trade ignore
the reality that the mainland concluded WTO was the best, if not the only, way forward. China's growth was
'almost certainly much slower than reported in official data', especially during the Asian financial crisis. For a
government which has staked its legitimacy on delivering sustained improvements in consumption and living
standards, this convinced the leadership it had to accelerate domestic reform.
'China's market access and other commitments are not only more far-reaching than those that governed the
accession of countries only a decade ago, they exceed those made by any member that has joined the WTO since
1995,' Lardy believes.
This view makes him sceptical of those who suspect China will use non-tariff barriers as a protectionist tool. He says
such measures as import registration, quality and safety standards appear to be little different from similar
programmes used by many trading countries.
Lardy also chastises some parts of the United States Government for harbouring strong doubts about China's
commitment to free trade and competition. He criticises Washington for hindering China's accession, saying it is the
only advanced industrial country which has no systematic technical assistance programme to help China develop the
capacity to meet its WTO obligations.
Lardy also urges Washington to drop the remaining Tiananmen sanctions, such as withholding some US
Export-Import Bank loans and credit guarantees for China-related deals or abstaining from voting on China loans
at World Bank meetings.
'These sanctions are largely symbolic. They send an incorrect message . . . and feed the impression the United States
is more interested in imposing tough conditions on China's WTO entry than in assisting China's historic economic
transformation,' he writes.
Within a decade, he predicts China will surpass Japan and Germany to become the world's second-largest trader
but this will pose more of a competitive challenge for other Asian countries than the US.
Despite the protectionist mechanisms built into the WTO agreement, he thinks the US should not and need not use
them. For instance, the special restrictions designed to curb big surges in apparel exports will not be necessary
because the likely job losses in the US industry will be fewer than 30,000 over a 15-year period.
Gloomy outlook challenges rosy reform view
IF YOU WANT a book that plays devil's advocate to Nicholas Lardy's generally rosy view of China's prospects
post-World Trade Organisation, then read William Gamble's cautionary work Investing in China - Legal, Financial
and Regulatory Risk.
Gamble, who runs a consultancy on investing in emerging markets, has compiled a sombre and unflattering look at
China's economic system.
'China is still a very dangerous place for foreign capital,' he says before illustrating all the risks.
He takes a hard poke at those who assume China will be able to function better under a rules-based system imposed
through the mechanisms of the WTO.
'It won't work. Although the leadership in Beijing may be totally sincere in their promises to the WTO, their ability
to carry out those promises may not exist,' he argues, detailing how the lack of an efficient legal infrastructure
hinders change.
Gamble thinks that, at least in the short term, the negative effects of WTO membership will be destabilising. Gains
in such industries as textiles, garments, shoes and toys could employ an extra 5.4 million workers over the next seven
years but threats loom larger.
Changes posed an 'immense threat to jobs, social stability, government revenue and the [Communist] Party's
economic power'.
Big government-run monopolies will fight tooth and nail to protect their interests, he warns.
The book examines the pitfalls of contract, the lack of a functioning bankruptcy system and the corruption that
undermines attempts to allow judges and lawyers to play their roles.
'Readers will understand that litigation is futile,' Gamble writes after describing the efforts of investors to assert
their property rights through the courts.
The book is particularly strong when countering optimism that China is finding solutions to its bad loans. Gamble
argues that China is doing everything but that; instead of creating a functioning bankruptcy law it is trying every
alternative such as mergers or supervised reconstruction.
He is sceptical that those loans and assets taken over by asset management companies will have any real value.
Often the original management of companies is left in place and it is hard to sell off land or sack workers.
'The process is almost a parody of the method used to solve the American savings-and-loan crisis during the late
1980s,' he writes. Relying on soft or policy loans to keep state-owned enterprises afloat, is, he asserts, 'absolutely the
worst method for dealing with insolvent enterprises'.
Asset management companies probably would never realise value on these debts but this had not discouraged
government hopes: 'The Government's solution relies to a great extent on the gullibility of foreign investors.'
Gamble is equally blunt that the Government's strategy of keeping state-owned enterprises afloat by throwing more
money at them through poorly regulated stock markets is not going to work in the long term either. He warns that
bolstering the country's insolvent banks by issuing bonds or shares will not make them any better, just further
plunder householders' savings.
From the point of view of investors, issuing bonds will make no difference.
'Instead of holding deposits in an insolvent bank, investors will be holding bonds in an insolvent bank,' Gamble
writes. For those pondering the merits of buying China concept stocks or real estate, this is the book to read before
taking the plunge.